|
(212) 349-3366 291 Broadway 13th Floor New York, N.Y. 10007 |
| Home | Our Firm | Practice Areas | Attorney Profiles | Cases | Contact |
| 310 East 4th LLC v. Farrell |
| After trial, Court found in favor of the Landlord and issued a final judgment of possession after finding that the Respondent could not succeed to the rent controlled apartment as she could not prove that her relationship with the deceased tenant of record rose to that of a non-traditional family member. |
| Ocean 2 LLC v. Grondal |
| After trial, Court found in favor of the Landlord and issued a final judgment of possession after finding that the Respondent could not succeed to the rent controlled apartment as he could not prove that his relationship with the deceased tenant of record rose to that of a non-traditional family member, as all of respondent's evidence only indicated a one-sided relationship and not one reciprocated by the deceased tenant of record. |
| Baltic Company v. Kurtz |
| After trial, Court found in favor of the Landlord and issued a final judgment of possession based on Respondent violating her lease by allowing an unauthorized individual to stay in the apartment and based upon the criminal activity of her guest. |
| Sumit I Associates LLC v. Pagan |
| After trial, Court found in favor of the Landlord and issued a judgment of possession finding that tenant's tampering with and unlawful possession of a security camera was criminal activity that affected the health and safety of other tenants and therefore a breach of the lease. |
| 311 Lincoln Place Investor LLC v. Woldmarian |
| The firm successfully opposed Respondent's motion for relief from a post-trial decision. Court found that Respondent's intentional and repeated failure to allow access for the Landlord to make repairs endangered the health and safety of other tenants and was therefore not curable. |
| 41-47 Nick LLC v. Helliman |
| After trial, a final judgment granting possession of the apartment to the Landlord was issued based upon the Respondent's failure to prove that her mother's apartment was her primary residence during the relevant time period prior to her mother's passing. |
| Lenoxville Associates v. Hassell |
| In a non-payment proceeding, the Court found in favor of the Landlord finding that a lump sum payment made to the tenant from her employer, based upon her grievance that she was not being paid the salary she was entitled to, is considered income for the purposes of calculating her rent in a HUD Subsidized Development. |
| Ninth Avenue Realty LLC v. MDDCAR Corp. |
| Court found that commercial tenant did violate the lease when it allowed a mechanic's lien to be placed against the premises and that the Landlord was entitled to possession when the tenant did not cure the violation within 15 days of receipt of a Notice to Cure. |
| Metro Court Redevelopment Associates LLP v. Riviero |
| Court granted Landlord's motion for summary judgment finding the tenant violated his HUD subsidized Development lease by engaging in drug related activity and issued a final judgment of possession. |
| Warren LLC v. Carbello |
| After trial, the Court awarded possession of the apartment to the Landlord after finding that the tenant of record was not using the apartment as her primary residence, but also never permanently vacated the apartment; therefore her son could not succeed to the tenancy. |
| Sumit I Associates LP v. Hernandez |
| After trial, Court granted a final judgment of possession and awards apartment to the Landlord after applying a strict liability standard to a violation of the HUD Subsidized Development lease based upon criminal activity involving drugs. |
| Echo Apartment Associates LP v. Medina |
| After trial, the Court awarded the apartment to the Landlord after finding that the Respondent was not a "remaining family member" as defined by the Code of Federal Regulations and therefore not entitled to stay in her deceased mother's HUD Subsidized Development apartment. |
| 1158 Brighton Co. v. Rothenberg |
| The Court granted Landlord's motion for summary judgment and awarded the Landlord possession of the apartment. Tenant of record had not been maintaining the subject premises as her primary residence, but never permanently vacated as she continued to sign lease renewals and pay rent. Therefore, although tenant of record was no longer entitled to the apartment her son could not claim succession. |
| Baltic Company v. Galindo |
| After trial, Court found in favor of Landlord and awarded possession of apartment based upon tenant engaging in criminal activity which was a violation of his HUD Stabilized Development lease. |
| Kent Village v. Iwamowicz |
| Successfully opposed Respondent's motion seeking the vacature of a previously entered Stipulation of Settlement. |
| Norfolk Development v. Kee |
| After trial, Court awarded a final judgment of possession in favor of the Landlord finding the Landlord met its burden of showing that the tenant did not maintain the subject premises as her primary residence and the tenant was unable to rebut said showing. |
| 20-22 Prince LLC v. Yen |
| After trial, Court awarded a final judgment of possession in favor of the Landlord finding that the deceased tenant's daughter was unable to offer enough evidence to establish a right to succeed to the tenancy of the rent controlled apartment. |